Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Reading, Writing, and the Love of Tintin



At seven, Bridger is slowly teaching himself to read, mainly through poring over Tintin comic books (thanks to my friend Danna, whose son loves Tintin, too, for bringing the books to my attention, and literacy advocate Jim Trelease of Read-Aloud Handbook fame for validating these books). My dearly beloved but not yet-initiated local librarian scoffed, "I'm not sure those count as books" when I commented on how much Bridger was loving Tintin. But here's what Trelease had to say:

"If you are looking to challenge a child's mind and vocabulary with comics, then I'd choose The Adventures of Tintin. . . If you read the list of favorite read-alouds offered by historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. in the New York Times Book Review, you would have found Herge's Tintin between Huckleberry Finn and the Greek myths."

Mind you, there are some heinous racial stereotypes in these comics, but I've tried to put those in historical context as we read and point out the inaccuracies and distortions. The stereotypes have actually provided some good fodder for discussion, and at times Herge even spoofs his own stereotypes from earlier comics, trying to correct earlier wrongs. But I can also imagine there are some parents who just wouldn't even want to introduce those stereotypes into their house. The comics do feature some violence and gunplay, though it's not bloody, is often implied rather than shown, and is no worse than what I devoured by the hour watching cartoons as a kid.

Probably if you are interested but not familiar with the books, you'd want to preview them first and decide for yourself. Tintin in Tibet is a pretty good, unobjectionable starting point--relatively free of violence and stereotypes, and just a rousing rescue yarn full of adventure and heart-warming loyalty. It was even cited positively by the Dalai Lama as one of the West's first glimpses of Tibet in popular culture.

But I'm warning you--once you read one, you will probably want to keep gobbling them up right alongside your child. I've found that my available time to read Tintin out loud to Bridger has not kept up with his interest in the books, so he often just looks at the pictures, and I suspect he is trying to figure out the words as he goes, too.

Concurrent with this frequent poring over of Tintin, Bridger is rapidly reading more and more words in the world around him--from street signs, store windows, the Internet, museum displays, cereal boxes, books I'm reading aloud to him and Cassidy.

I'm thrilled at how much he's learning, reading-wise, in a way that is pleasurable and stress-free for him. I'm trying not to get too antsy about the fact that he has not gotten equally interested in, say, writing his own Tintin-inspired comics, or writing down stories about the Legos creations he's endlessly weaving in his head. He's not even interested in my taking dictation from him, though I'd be thrilled to do it and I offer, though maybe not as often as I should. The most he's done recently in the way of writing is slipping a pictographic note to Cassidy under her door to tell her he was mad at her. It started with the letter "I", then came a lightning bolt, then "U." To underscore the point, he drew a picture of himself, frowning, with an "M" and an arrow pointing to the figure. (I'm guessing the "M" represents "me"?) Vivid, yes. Up to grade level and easily understood by everyone? Well, um, no.

Why doesn't this "behindness" worry me? Well, for starters, I've been inspired by thinkers, from Raymond and Dorothy Moore to Waldorf educators and unschooler Sandra Dodd, who argue that there may actually be educational and developmental benefits for kids who are late readers and writers (not to say that there aren't some wonderful benefits for early readers and writers, too--we just rarely hear about any advantages of late reading in our "earlier is better" culture).

There are actually kids who don't read and write fluently until they are 11 or 12 who become effective writers and avid readers as teenagers and young adults. I've known them, both personally and through the anecdotes of others. In addition to turning out perfectly capable, these kids have also gained the confidence that comes with independently mastering subjects our culture assumes must be taught to children by experts. I personally believe that that kind of self-directed learning is a wonderful preparation for the tasks these kids will have to face later in life, when no one will be giving them step-by-step instructions for how to accomplish their goals.

That's why it doesn't freak me out (well, not that much) that Bridger is "behind" in his writing. I just figure he's working really hard on other things right now, and writing will come when he's ready and sees a real need for it in his life. Granted, there are plenty of kids who don't read and write well when they're young who still have trouble with reading and writing when they're older. Sometimes there are learning problems that need addressing, sometimes it's a lack of opportunity and resources--but I'd speculate that a key difference in how "late" reading and writing play out long-term is how the adults around the child respond. Do they say, "You can't read, and you should be able to by now" to the child, or do they simply say, "You're not reading yet, but when you're ready, you will"? I suspect the difference between those two statements could be life-changing.

Still, I have to admit I will exhale a huge sigh of relief and joy when Bridger does finally start writing, for real. It's ironic, really. Before I had children, I used to teach creative writing to kids, both in public schools and with small groups of homeschoolers. I was often struck by how amazed the teachers and parents were that my classes had inspired reluctant writers--especially the boys--to write. At times I felt pretty dang smug about my ability to work creative miracles. Now, I think I understand how profoundly grateful I will feel when my kids find the mentors who will allow them to discover their own potential in ways that I--for whatever reasons of history, personality, relationship, karma--cannot.

For now, I'm grateful to Tintin for helping Bridger to gradually unlock the mysteries of reading, in his own, Bridger-esque way. And I am trying to trust that given time and lots of different opportunities, writing will click for him, too, in a way I might never expect but that will make me marvel when it happens.

3 comments:

Liza said...

Tintin is a fave at our house, too. Stella likes to look at the pictures, and Phoebe sleeps with "The Blue Lotus" almost every night. I know there are horrible stereotypes, but I had every Tintin book when I was a kid, and I like to think I turned out kinda OK?

I think sibling rivalry is a huge spur for communication of every variety, including writing. For a while, I came home from work to find a post-it note for me on the front door almost every night. Now, granted, the notes often said stuff like, "Dear mean family...I do not like you." But I rejoiced in her use of elipses, and figured her frustration with us probably meant that somewhere we were probably doing something right. And now I'm just as likely to find a note that says, "Stella, you're funny and I love you." How great is that?

Sharing books, and love of books, is so great. Can't wait for Bridger to get into it and to share favorites over the fence.

Phoebe read most of the Roald Dahl books over Christmas. We have "The BFG" and "Matilda" and "The Twits," I think, if Bridger wants some chapter books. We're starting to hear about some mean girl clique-i-ness, so I got Phoebe "Harriet the Spy." She got about halfway through, and then put it aside. But she loved the first Harry Potter and "The Trumpet of the Swan." It's so fun to see her read all the things that I did as a kid, and to know that we have them in common. And it's lovely, during these dreary days as winter drags on, to watch her curl up on the sofa with a good book. Not because I want her to, but because she loves it, too.

Cheers!

kate hopper said...

It's so amazing to watch them sound out and make connections, isn't it? And I love your approach.

I was a late bloomer with reading, and it doesn't seem to have adversely affected me. (Though I still wish I could read FASTER.)

Los Pyefeld said...

Oh, thank you for posting this! I have felt so lazy to write about Tintin again. So, I think I'll just link to your post, b/c you said it all so well. :)

I have also found that instead of warping Ezra's mind, the racial stereotypes have led to some interesting discussions, and no stereotypes seem to be forming in his head. He also has gotten really interested in the Blackfeet Indians and their clothes and art after reading "Tintin in America."

And the vocabulary. . . amazing! We often look up words together because of Tintin!

And I commend your patience about the reading and writing. It is so cool to see what inspires each child. I can't wait to hear about how it unfolds for him.